Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Clin Virol ; 156: 105197, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1945514

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the clinical course of the COVID-19 in adults has been extensively described, the impact of the co-detection of SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus on severity outcomes is not understood. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the risk of hospitalization of outpatients with COVID-19 with and without the co-detection of rhinovirus in southern Brazil. Secondarily, such risk was also compared between all individuals with COVID-19 and those with single rhinovirus infection. STUDY DESIGN: Outpatients (>18 years) with acute signs of cough, fever, or sore throat were prospectively enrolled at two emergency departments from May to September 2020. Sample collection was performed to detect SARS-CoV-2 and other 20 respiratory pathogens. Participants were followed for 28 days through telephone interviews. RESULTS: 1,047 participants were screened and 1,044 were included. Of these, 4.9% were lost during follow-up, and 993/1,044 (95.1%) were included in severity-related analysis. Rhinovirus was the most prevalent pathogen (25.0%, 248/993), followed by SARS-CoV-2 (22.6%, 224/993), with coinfection of these two viruses occurring in 91/993 (9.2%) participants. The risk of COVID-19-related hospitalizations were not different between individuals with and without co-detection of rhinovirus (9.9% vs. 7.6%, respectively, P = 0.655). Conversely, subjects with COVID-19 had a higher hospitalization risk than single rhinovirus infection (8.3 vs 0.4%, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The co-detection of SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus did not change the risk of hospitalizations in adults. Furthermore, COVID-19 was more severe than single rhinovirus infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Hospitalization , Humans , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Rhinovirus , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 6844, 2021 11 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1537310

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 manifests as a milder disease in children than adults, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully characterized. Here we assess the difference in cellular or humoral immune responses of pediatric and adult COVID-19 patients to see if these factors contribute to the severity dichotomy. Children's non-specific immune profile is dominated by naive lymphocytes and HLA-DRhighCX3CR1low dendritic cells; meanwhile, children show strong specific antibody and T cell responses for viral structural proteins, with their T cell responses differing from adults by having weaker CD8+TNF+ T cells responses to S peptide pool but stronger responses to N and M peptide pools. Finally, viral mRNA is more abundant in pediatric patients. Our data thus support a scenario in which SARS-CoV-2 infected children contribute to transmission yet are less susceptible to COVID-19 symptoms due to strong and differential responses to the virus.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , Immunity, Humoral , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Brazil , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Child , Child, Preschool , Cytokines/blood , Female , Humans , Immunity, Innate , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Messenger , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , T-Lymphocytes , Viral Structural Proteins/immunology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL